Live

PRODUCT 01

Verdict

Adversarial debate between rival-vendor frontier models, with a judge. You get the answer that survived, a confidence score, and a map of exactly where the models disagreed.

One model checking its own work shares its own blind spots. Two models from rival vendors do not. The disagreement between them is the most useful signal available, and it is the signal almost every AI product throws away.

Adversarial by design

Frontier models from rival vendors answer independently, then attack each other's reasoning. A judge rules on what survived. The output is not a consensus and it is not an average: it is a ruling, with the dissent attached.

Where it runs

On the web, and as a connector inside Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and Perplexity. It runs where the work already happens rather than asking anyone to move. A mobile app is shipping.

What you get back

A verdict, a confidence score, and a disagreement map showing which claims were contested and how they were resolved. The disagreement map is the part you can hand to someone else.

The verification methodA question enters. Two rival-vendor models answer independently and attack each other's reasoning. A judge rules, producing a verdict, a confidence score and a disagreement map.InputA questionExpensive to get wrongSide AFrontier model, vendor oneAnswers independentlySide BFrontier model, rival vendorAnswers independentlyattack roundsJudgeImpartialRules on what survivedVerdictConfidence scoreDisagreement mapThe dissent is published alongside the ruling. Where the two sides split is the part worth reading.
A question enters. Rival-vendor models argue it. A judge rules, and the dissent is published alongside the ruling.

AVAILABLE IN

ClaudeChatGPTCursorPerplexityWeb

Verdict is sold on its own site, including a free tier. Pricing lives there and is not duplicated here.

Pricing on finalverdict.ai
Verdict is an independent product. Anthropic and OpenAI are not affiliated with and do not endorse Verdict.

Verdict is live.